educational

Foreign Content and 2257

When the new Section 2257 regulations were released, they created a fair amount of concern for American adult content producers who use foreign talent. The problem for American producers was that a strict interpretation of the regulations led to the conclusion that U.S. producers could no longer legally use foreign talent in their productions due to the foreign ID requirements.

A recent Department of Justice filing in Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzalez, (the case challenging the new Section 2257 regulations), alleviates one small part of the Foreign ID concern – American productions using foreign talent are no longer on questionable legal ground – provided that the ground they are filmed on is not American soil.

The regulations state that any producer of sexually explicit content must create and maintain records containing "[t]he legal name and date of birth of each performer, obtained by the producer's examination of a picture identification card." [emphasis added]. The law defines picture identification card by naming a laundry list of U.S. identification documents such as a passport, a "green card," or a driver's license issued by any state. This section allows for foreign equivalents only when the talent and the producer are both "located outside the United States."

The regulations clearly prohibit the review of foreign-issued ID, (even a foreign passport) unless the talent and the producer are both located outside the United States. The regulations are less clear on what "located outside the United States" means in this context. Does it mean that these parties must be based or domiciled outside the United States? Or does it mean that they must physically be outside the United States when the production takes place? Given the fact that a violation of Section 2257 could result in federal incarceration, the safe-bet position was that American producers were out of the foreign-content business unless they employed overseas primary producers as intermediaries.

In a recent response to interrogatories in Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzalez, the Justice Department retreated from a hard-line interpretation of the regulations. The DOJ's current position is that the words "located outside the United States" means "located outside the United States at the time of production." Given the importance of this distinction, it is surprising that the DOJ did not include these five words in the original regulations, and thus clearly demarcate what conduct is permitted.

Since the DOJ did not include this clarification in the regulations, and the regulations have not been modified, it should be noted that the statement in the Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzalez case is not necessarily binding, and the DOJ could potentially take a contrary position at any time. Anyone subject to prosecution could make an argument that they relied on the DOJ's interrogatory response, and the success of such an argument is likely, but not guaranteed. Nevertheless, at this time, it appears that American producers who use foreign talent can comply with Section 2257 by examining and copying foreign identification, as long as they do so outside of U.S. territory.

This legal scenario creates quite a bizarre result. The regulations, when colored with the Government's position in Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzalez, means that American producers can use foreign talent, supported by a review of foreign identification if they do so in a foreign country, but that it does not matter in which foreign country the production takes place.

For example, an American producer could shoot content in Mexico using Russian talent, showing a Canadian ID, but the same exact content would not be legal if it were filmed across the border in California. More absurd is the fact that a Canadian producer, using Canadian talent, could not film a production on location in the United States (unless the talent had US identification). Of course, this is an over-simplification – they could "film" the content, but they could not legally distribute it in the United States.

What is absolutely clear is that if a producer uses foreign talent on US soil, that talent must have an American passport, a "green card," or a US-issued driver's license (or other American ID as permitted by the regulations). Otherwise, no matter how old the talent is, and no matter how reliable her foreign ID is, the producer risks imprisonment in the "land of the free" for violating a law supposedly enacted to keep children from being exploited.

Marc J. Randazza, Esq. is an attorney with the law firm of Weston, Garrou, DeWitt & Walters, which maintains offices in Orlando, Los Angeles, and San Diego. The firm handles First Amendment cases nationwide, and has been involved in significant Free Speech litigation before the United States Supreme Court. All statements made in the above article are matters of opinion only, and should not be considered legal advice. Please consult your personal attorney for information on specific legal issues. Mr. Randazza may be reached at mrandazza@firstamendment.com, at his office, (407) 389-4529, or at AIM Screen Name: "Mrandazza007."

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Breaking Down HB 805 and How it Affects the Adult Industry

North Carolina House Bill 805 was enacted July 29, after the state legislature overrode Governor Josh Stein’s veto. The provisions that relate to the adult industry, imposing requirements for age verification, consent and content removal, are scheduled to become effective Dec. 1. Platforms have until then to update their policies and systems to comply with the new regulations.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Staying Compliant With Payment Standards Across Europe and Australia

So, you’ve got your eye on international growth. Smart move. No matter where adult-industry merchants operate, however, one requirement remains consistent: regulatory compliance. This isn’t just a legal checkbox — it’s a critical component of keeping payments flowing and business operations intact.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

How to Avoid Copyright Pitfalls When Using Music in Adult Content

When creating an adult video, bringing your vision to life often means assembling just the right ingredients — including the right music. However, adding music to adult content can raise complex legal and ethical issues.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
opinion

New Visa Rules Adult Merchants Need to Know

In December 2024, I shared an update on the upcoming rollout of Visa’s Acquirer Monitoring Program, also known as VAMP. The final version went into effect in June, and enforcement will begin in October. With just a month to go, now is the time to review what’s changing and how to stay compliant.

Cathy Beardsley ·
profile

Dan Leal Talks Balance, Business and Daily Rituals

“We were in a big field, and I hopped off a little ledge to cut through some grass, and my knee just gave out,” he explains. “I thought it was my calf because I’d torn my calf muscle back in December, but I had an MRI that confirmed a torn ACL.”

Jeff Dana ·
profile

Sarah Illustrates Spins Chill Vibes Into Viral Fame

Lounging in her sunny SoCal backyard in between content shoots, with her hair swept into a no-fuss ponytail and the sun dappling her shoulders, Sarah Illustrates looks every bit the hot mom next door — because, well, she is. The kind of mom who bakes fresh bread on the weekends, juggles dance recitals and baseball games, and delights in life’s simpler joys, like family time and trips to Target.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

WIA Profile: Lainie Speiser

With her fiery red hair and a laugh that practically hugs you, Lainie Speiser is impossible to miss. Having repped some of adult’s biggest stars during her 30-plus years in the business, the veteran publicist is also a treasure trove of tales dating back to the days when print was king and social media not even a glimmer in the industry’s eye.

Women in Adult ·
opinion

Fighting Back Against AI-Fueled Fake Takedown Notices

The digital landscape is increasingly being shaped by artificial intelligence, and while AI offers immense potential, it’s also being weaponized. One disturbing trend that directly impacts adult businesses is AI-powered “DMCA takedown services” generating a flood of fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Building Seamless Checkout Flows for High-Risk Merchants

For high-risk merchants such as adult businesses, crypto payments are no longer just a backup plan — they’re fast becoming a first choice. More and more businesses are embracing Bitcoin and other digital currencies for consumer transactions.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

What the New SCOTUS Ruling Means for AV Laws and Free Speech

On June 27, 2025, the United States Supreme Court handed down its landmark decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, upholding Texas’ age verification law in the face of a constitutional challenge and setting a new precedent that bolsters similar laws around the country.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
Show More